Despite the cloud-first focus of many technology discussions, on-premise SharePoint remains critically important for thousands of organizations worldwide. While Microsoft continues pushing toward cloud solutions, many enterprises find compelling reasons to maintain their SharePoint servers locally. With end-of-support dates approaching for SharePoint 2016 and 2019 platforms, IT leaders face important decisions about their information management strategy.
The choice between cloud migration and continued on-premise deployment isn’t merely technical—it involves regulatory compliance, existing workflows, and specific business requirements. SharePoint Server Subscription Edition offers a potential path forward for organizations that cannot or choose not to migrate to SharePoint Online. Additionally, many businesses implement hybrid approaches that leverage both deployment models.
This guide examines why on-premise SharePoint will still matter in 2026, helping technology leaders evaluate their options against business needs, security requirements, and long-term strategic goals.
Understanding the 2026 End-of-Support Deadline
For organizations running on-premise SharePoint deployments, a critical deadline looms on the horizon. Both SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 versions face a common end-of-support milestone that demands strategic planning and timely decision-making.
Timeline for SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019
Microsoft has established July 14, 2026, as the official end-of-support date for both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Server 2019 [1]. This date marks the conclusion of Microsoft’s extended support phase for these versions, following their Fixed Lifecycle Policy [2]. Notably, SharePoint Server 2016 has already completed its mainstream support period (which ended July 13, 2021), whereas SharePoint Server 2019 will exit mainstream support on January 9, 2024 [3]. During the current extended support phase, Microsoft provides critical security updates but no longer implements functional enhancements or non-security improvements.
Furthermore, organizations should note that SharePoint Add-Ins and Azure Access Control Service (ACS) authentication will retire even sooner—on April 2, 2026 [4]. This earlier cutoff presents a hard deadline for applications or customizations relying on these technologies.
What End-of-Support Means for Security and Compliance
The cessation of support has profound security implications. Once the deadline passes, Microsoft will no longer provide:
- Security updates or patches
- Bug fixes or functional improvements
- Technical support services (paid or unpaid)
- Online technical content updates [3]
Consequently, running unsupported SharePoint environments introduces substantial risks. After July 2026, organizations continuing with these versions will operate without security patches against emerging vulnerabilities [4]. Recent exploits in 2025 have already demonstrated weaknesses in legacy SharePoint environments [4], underscoring the genuine threat landscape.
From a compliance perspective, organizations face equally serious challenges. Many regulatory frameworks explicitly require the use of supported, patched software systems. Continuing with unsupported SharePoint instances may violate compliance requirements across various standards including GDPR, HIPAA, and NIST frameworks [4]. For regulated industries, this compliance gap often appears as a high-risk finding during audits [4].
Microsoft’s Strategic Shift Toward Cloud
The end-of-support timeline reflects Microsoft’s broader strategic vision prioritizing cloud technologies. Although Microsoft continues offering an on-premise option through SharePoint Server Subscription Edition, their product development and innovation efforts primarily target cloud platforms [3].
Modern SharePoint experiences benefit from advanced security controls that legacy deployments cannot match. These include capabilities like Conditional Access policies, sensitivity labels, and comprehensive auditing through Microsoft Purview [4]. Classic on-premise pages often lack the infrastructure to leverage these protections, creating security disparities between deployment models.
The audit gap presents particular challenges. Modern SharePoint logs every file action, query, and permission change to the Microsoft Purview Unified Audit Log, establishing clear chains of custody [4]. However, classic pages frequently rely on custom scripts operating outside this auditable framework—a limitation Microsoft explicitly acknowledges as preventing proper script insertion and execution auditing.
For organizations considering their options beyond 2026, the decision involves balancing security needs, compliance requirements, and operational priorities against Microsoft’s cloud-first development roadmap.
Why On-Premise SharePoint Still Has Strategic Value
While cloud platforms continue to evolve, many enterprises recognize compelling reasons to maintain on-premise SharePoint deployments beyond 2026. The strategic value of local SharePoint servers extends beyond mere resistance to change, addressing specific business requirements that cloud solutions cannot fully satisfy.
Data Sovereignty and Regulatory Compliance Needs
Data sovereignty—the concept that data remains under customer control and governed by local law—represents a primary justification for on-premise deployments. This sovereignty encompasses two critical facets: enforcement of customer control through security mechanisms and adherence to the laws where an organization operates [5].
Organizations facing strict data localization requirements often maintain on-premise SharePoint to ensure complete control over data residency. Unlike cloud solutions, on-premise deployments guarantee that sensitive information never leaves designated physical boundaries. This control proves especially valuable for:
- Public sector entities with classified information
- Defense contractors handling sensitive records
- Healthcare organizations with specific sector regulations
- Financial institutions under strict jurisdictional requirements
For enterprises requiring advanced data residency control, an on-premise approach eliminates concerns about cross-border data transfers that might trigger additional compliance reviews [6]. This control extends beyond storage location to encompass who can access data and under what circumstances.
Custom Workflows and Legacy Integrations
On-premise SharePoint environments often host business-critical workflows that automate essential processes. These workflows help organizations standardize business procedures, improve collaboration on documents, and manage project tasks systematically [7].
Significantly, on-premise SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 continue supporting various workflow technologies through 2026 [8]. This capability proves invaluable for organizations with extensive investments in SharePoint 2010 workflows that would require substantial redevelopment if migrated to cloud platforms.
SharePoint workflow interop allows invoking SharePoint 2010 workflows from within modern SharePoint workflows—providing a technical bridge that preserves existing functionality [9]. For enterprises with line-of-business applications tightly integrated with on-premise SharePoint, this compatibility preserves mission-critical operations.
Offline Access and Network Independence
On-premise SharePoint configurations provide robust offline capabilities that remain valuable in environments with connectivity challenges. Users can synchronize content locally, continue working during network outages, and automatically reconcile changes once connectivity returns [10].
When network connections fail, Access automatically switches to offline mode, allowing users to continue working with a cached local copy of SharePoint list data [10]. Similarly, synchronized document libraries remain accessible through dedicated applications even when servers are unavailable.
This offline capability proves essential for organizations with remote workers, field operations in areas with unstable connectivity, or business continuity requirements demanding continued functionality during outages.
Control Over Update Cycles and Downtime
On-premise deployments afford organizations precise control over when and how updates occur—a critical consideration for businesses with strict operational windows. SharePoint Server 2016 introduced zero-downtime patching capabilities that minimize service interruptions during maintenance [11].
This control allows IT teams to:
- Schedule patches during optimal operational windows
- Test updates thoroughly before deployment
- Roll back problematic patches if needed
- Coordinate maintenance with business cycles
Through techniques like load balancer management, organizations can maintain near-continuous availability even during patching operations. As one administrator noted: “I am sure that once the webfront is out of the load balancer (completely) then everything that has to do with windows, sharepoint and sql will probably work just fine” [11].
This update control addresses a frequent concern about cloud platforms, where update cycles operate on the provider’s schedule rather than aligning with specific business requirements.
Evaluating SharePoint Server Subscription Edition (SPSE)
SharePoint Server Subscription Edition (SPSE) represents Microsoft’s newest on-premise offering, introduced in November 2021 as a strategic response to organizations requiring local deployment while still benefiting from regular updates. SPSE stands as a crucial option for companies planning their SharePoint strategy beyond the 2026 end-of-support deadline.
Continuous Update Model vs Traditional Releases
SPSE fundamentally transforms how on-premise SharePoint deployments receive updates and features. Unlike traditional SharePoint versions with their 10-year support lifecycle and major version upgrades, SPSE introduces a continuous update model based on a monthly subscription licensing approach [12]. This new paradigm delivers:
- Monthly updates containing the latest security fixes, bug fixes, and feature enhancements [12]
- Two major feature updates annually (Version 25H1 and Version 25H2 in 2025) [13]
- Elimination of costly major version upgrades previously required to access new features [12]
This “Constantly Current” principle allows organizations to maintain modern capabilities without disruptive migration projects. Organizations install a single software update monthly to stay current with all security fixes and feature experiences [14]. This approach keeps on-premise deployments more closely aligned with cloud feature sets than was previously possible.
Upgrade Paths from SharePoint 2016 and 2019
SPSE marks a significant departure from Microsoft’s traditional upgrade policies by supporting direct migrations from both SharePoint 2016 and SharePoint 2019 platforms:
- Both versions use the database-attach method for upgrades to SPSE [2]
- All databases must be upgraded to version 16.0.4351.1000 or higher before migration [2]
- The migration process includes backing up content and service application databases, restoring them to the SPSE environment, and upgrading them [2]
- Organizations can set original environments to read-only during migration to maintain user access [2]
This “N-1 and N-2 version-to-version upgrade” capability [3] allows companies to skip intermediate versions—a first in SharePoint’s history. Formerly, organizations needed to perform sequential upgrades (e.g., SP2013 to SP2016 to SP2019). According to Microsoft documentation, “companies who took a wait-and-see approach with their SharePoint 2013 installations now need a 3rd party product to upgrade” [15], making this new flexibility particularly valuable.
SPSE vs SharePoint Online: Feature Comparison
Although both SPSE and SharePoint Online receive regular updates, key differences exist in their feature sets, control options, and implementation approaches:
Security Enhancements
SPSE incorporates significant security improvements, particularly when deployed on Windows Server 2022, such as:
- Support for TLS 1.3 and strong TLS encryption by default [3]
- Encrypted machineKey sections in web.config files [3]
- Automatic machine key rotation (weekly rather than monthly as of September 2025) [16]
- Enhanced AMSI Filter capabilities with default “always on” setting [16]
On-Premise Specific Advantages
SPSE prioritizes features specifically for on-premises environments [12]:
- Integrated AppFabric caching technology (previously required as separate installation) [3]
- Host header binding for SharePoint Central Administration website [3]
- Per-database connection encryption settings, allowing different settings for databases on different SQL servers [13]
- Document Intelligence leveraging AI for document management [13]
Integration Capabilities
SPSE maintains integration with key Microsoft technologies though differences exist compared to Online:
- Integration with Project Server, Power Apps, and Power BI [4]
- Power Apps and Power Automate require data gateway configuration to connect cloud with on-premises [4]
- SharePoint Online offers deeper integration with Microsoft 365 applications [4]
Ultimately, SPSE reflects Microsoft’s acknowledgment that many organizations require on-premise deployments for specific business reasons while simultaneously wanting modern capabilities and security enhancements.
Securing and Modernizing On-Premise SharePoint in 2026
Security remains a paramount concern for organizations maintaining on-premise SharePoint deployments beyond 2026. Protecting these environments requires a multi-layered approach that combines regular updates with proactive security measures.
Applying Latest Security Patches and CVE Mitigations
The cybersecurity landscape continually evolves, as evidenced by significant SharePoint vulnerabilities discovered throughout 2025 [17]. Organizations must apply comprehensive security updates for all supported versions of SharePoint Server immediately upon release. These updates address critical vulnerabilities like CVE-2025-53770 and CVE-2025-53771, which affect on-premise deployments [17]. Microsoft consistently releases cumulative security updates—meaning newer updates contain all previous fixes, streamlining the patching process [18]. For SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019, both updates provided for each vulnerability should be applied [19].
Enabling AMSI and Defender Antivirus Integration
Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) integration represents an essential security layer that allows SharePoint Server to work with antivirus solutions. Starting with SharePoint Server Subscription Edition Version 25H1, AMSI extends scanning capabilities to include HTTP request bodies [20]. This enhancement detects and mitigates threats embedded in request payloads.
To maximize protection, configure AMSI with these settings:
- Enable AMSI scan feature for all web applications
- Set Request Body Scan to Full Mode for comprehensive protection [20]
- Deploy Microsoft Defender Antivirus on all SharePoint servers [19]
Full Mode offers the strongest security by scanning request bodies sent to all endpoints except those explicitly excluded [20]. This configuration effectively stops unauthenticated attackers from exploiting vulnerabilities [19].
Rotating Machine Keys and Restarting IISASP.NET
After applying security updates or enabling AMSI, rotating machine keys becomes critically important ASP.NET[17]. This process helps mitigate potential attacks by invalidating existing session tokens. Administrators can rotate keys through:
- PowerShell using the Set-SPMachineKey cmdlet followed by Update-SPMachineKey [19]
- Central Administration by triggering the Machine Key Rotation timer job [17]
Once rotation completes, restart Internet Information Services (IIS) on all SharePoint servers using iisreset.exe [17]. This step ensures that all changes take effect properly and that any malicious modules are not reloaded [21].
Implementing Role-Based Access and Governance Policies
SharePoint’s robust role-based access control (RBAC) model allows administrators to assign permissions based on organizational roles [22]. This approach ensures precise control over who can access content and what actions they can perform. Security best practices include:
- Limiting membership in administrator groups
- Creating custom role definitions for specific business needs
- Implementing security policies at the web application level [23]
Web application policies provide uniform security enforcement throughout site collections, allowing rights to be granted or denied across entire environments [23]. These policies override site-level permissions, effectively blocking unauthorized access even when explicit permissions exist at lower levels [23].
Hybrid and Alternative Strategies for Long-Term Planning
Beyond security considerations, organizations must develop comprehensive strategies for their SharePoint environments moving forward. Strategic planning involves evaluating various deployment models alongside workforce readiness for future technology needs.
When to Consider a Hybrid SharePoint Deployment
Hybrid SharePoint approaches effectively balance on-premise control with cloud benefits. Organizations typically adopt hybrid models when facing regulatory compliance requirements, maintaining legacy applications that cannot be migrated, or seeking scalability without full cloud commitment [1]. Hybrid deployment types include search integration, OneDrive synchronization, connected sites, extranet portals, and cross-environment workflows [1].
Evaluating Open-Source Alternatives like eXo Platform
For organizations seeking independence from proprietary systems, open-source platforms offer compelling advantages:
- eXo Platform provides content management capabilities with branded sites, document management, and mobile access [24]
- Open-source solutions eliminate license fees, focusing investment on hosting, support, and customization [25]
- These alternatives enable complete control over functionality, design, and data sovereignty [25]
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Cloud vs On-Prem vs Hybrid
Financial considerations differ markedly across deployment models. Cloud expenses follow usage-based patterns (compute, storage, data transfer), whereas on-premise costs encompass hardware, facilities, warranties, and staffing [26]. Hybrid models strategically combine these approaches—maintaining core capacity on-premise alongside cloud resources for specific needs [26].
Skills Availability and IT Workforce Considerations
IT talent planning remains essential regardless of deployment choice. Organizations must compare current skillsets against emerging technologies to identify gaps [27]. Furthermore, organizations should prioritize developing talent pipelines for critical technical roles to ensure leadership continuity [27].
Conclusion
As organizations approach the 2026 end-of-support deadline for SharePoint 2016 and 2019, strategic planning becomes essential for maintaining secure and effective information management systems. Though Microsoft continues its cloud-first strategy, on-premise SharePoint deployments remain critically important for many enterprises facing strict regulatory requirements, complex legacy integrations, and specific operational needs.
SharePoint Server Subscription Edition offers a viable path forward, delivering continuous updates and enhanced security features while preserving the control advantages of on-premise deployment. This “Constantly Current” model eliminates disruptive upgrade cycles while keeping security protections current—a significant benefit for organizations that cannot migrate to cloud platforms.
Security considerations must guide any on-premise strategy beyond 2026. Regular patch application, AMSI integration, machine key rotation, and role-based access controls work together to create defensive layers against evolving threats. Organizations that maintain these practices can significantly reduce their vulnerability exposure despite using on-premise systems.
Hybrid deployments present another compelling option, balancing cloud benefits with on-premise control. This approach allows organizations to maintain sensitive workloads locally while leveraging cloud capabilities for appropriate use cases. Similarly, open-source alternatives offer freedom from vendor-specific roadmaps at the cost of internal support requirements.
The decision between cloud migration, continued on-premise deployment, or hybrid approaches ultimately depends on each organization’s unique requirements. Factors such as regulatory constraints, existing technical debt, offline needs, and update control preferences all shape the optimal strategy. Regardless of deployment choice, developing appropriate technical skills within IT teams remains crucial for long-term success.
Organizations that carefully assess their specific needs against available options will find that on-premise SharePoint can still deliver substantial business value well beyond 2026, especially when deployed with appropriate security controls and modernization strategies.
References
[1] – https://www.xavor.com/blog/hybrid-deployment-strategies-for-sharepoint-and-microsoft-365/
[4] – https://www.nakivo.com/blog/sharepoint-vs-sharepoint-online-full-comparison/
[6] – https://sharegate.com/blog/microsoft-365-vs-on-prem-security-a-decision-framework
[7] – https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/governance/workflow-in-sharepoint-server
[8] – https://compass365.com/sharepoint-2013-workflows-are-being-retired-act-now-to-modernize/
[12] – https://linktek.com/sharepoint-2019-on-premise-versus-hosted-in-the-cloud-which-one-is-better/
[14] – https://linktek.com/10-points-to-consider-sharepoint-online-vs-on-premises/
[15] – https://compass365.com/should-we-upgrade-to-sharepoint-server-subscription-edition/
[22] – https://enkompas.com/security-sharepoint-user-permissions-by-role/
[24] – https://www.exoplatform.com/sharepoint-alternative/
[25] – https://www.exoplatform.com/blog/best-open-source-alternatives-to-microsoft-sharepoint/


Comments are closed